Control of Microbial Growth (page 6)
(This chapter has 6 pages)
© Kenneth Todar, PhD
Bacterial resistance to
antibiotics
Penicillin became generally available for
treatment
of bacterial infections, especially those caused by staphylococci and
streptococci,
about 1946. Initially, the antibiotic was effective against all sorts
of
infections caused by these two Gram-positive bacteria. Resistance to
penicillin
in some strains of staphylococci was recognized almost immediately.
(Resistance
to penicillin today occurs in as many as 80% of all strains of Staphylococcus
aureus). Surprisingly, Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A
strep)
have not fully developed resistance to penicillin and it remains a
reasonable
drug of choice for many types of streptococcal infections. Natural
penicillins
have never been effective against most Gram-negative pathogens (e.g. Salmonella,
Shigella, Bordetella pertussis, Yersinia pestis, Pseudomonas) with
the notable exception of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Gram-negative
bacteria
are inherently resistant because their vulnerable cell wall is
protected
by an outer membrane that prevents permeation of the penicillin
molecule.
The period of the late 1940s and early 1950s saw
the discovery and introduction of streptomycin, chloramphenicol, and
tetracycline,
and the age of antibiotic chemotherapy came into full being. These
antibiotics
were effective against the full array of bacterial pathogens including
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, intracellular parasites, and
the tuberculosis bacillus. However, by 1953, during a Shigella
outbreak
in Japan, a strain of the dysentery bacillus was isolated which was
multiple
drug resistant, exhibiting resistance to chloramphenicol, tetracycline,
streptomycin, and the sulfanilamides. There was also evidence mounting
that bacteria could pass genes for multiple drug resistance between
strains
and even between species. It was also apparent that Mycobacterium
tuberculosis
was capable of rapid development of resistance to streptomycin which
had
become a mainstay in tuberculosis therapy.
By the 1960's it became apparent that some
bacterial
pathogens were developing resistance to antibiotic-after-antibiotic, at
a rate faster than new antibiotics could be brought to market. A more
conservative
approach to the use of antibiotics has not been fully accepted by the
medical
and agricultural communities, and the problems of emerging
multiple-drug
resistant pathogens still loom. The most important pathogens to emerge
in multiple drug resistant forms so far have been Mycobacterium
tuberculosis
and Staphylococcus aureus.
The basis of bacterial
resistance to antibiotics

An antibiotic
sensitivity test performed on an agar plate. The discs are seeded with
antibiotics planted on the agar surface. Interpretation of the size of
the bacterial "zones of inhibition" relates to the possible use of the
antibiotic in a clinical setting. The organism is resistant to the
antibiotics planted on the plate at 5 o'clock and 9 o'clock.
Bacterial resistance to an antimicrobial agent
may be due to some innate property of the organism or it may due to
acquisition of some genetic trait as described below.
Inherent (Natural) Resistance - Bacteria
may
be inherently resistant to an antibiotic. For example, a streptomycete
may have some natural gene that is responsible for resistance to its
own
antibiotic;
or a Gram-negative bacterium has an outer membrane that establishes a
permeability
barrier against the antibiotic; or an organism lacks a transport system
for the antibiotic; or it lacks the target or reaction that is hit by
the
antibiotic.
Acquired Resistance - Bacteria can
develop
resistance to antibiotics, e.g. bacterial populations
previously-sensitive
to antibiotics become resistant. This type of resistance results from
changes
in the bacterial genome. Acquired resistance is driven by two genetic
processes
in bacteria: (1) mutation and selection (sometimes referred to as
vertical
evolution); (2) exchange of genes between strains and species
(sometimes
called horizontal evolution or horizontal gene transmission).
Vertical evolution is strictly a matter
of
Darwinian evolution driven by principles of natural selection: a
spontaneous
mutation in the bacterial chromosome imparts resistance to a member of
the bacterial population. In the selective environment of the
antibiotic,
the wild type (non mutants) are killed and the resistant mutant is
allowed
to grow and flourish. The mutation rate for most bacterial genes is
approximately
10-8. This means that if a bacterial population doubles from
108 cells to 2 x 108 cells, there is likely to be
a mutant present for any given gene. Since bacteria grow to reach
population
densities far in excess of 109 cells, such a mutant could
develop
from a single generation during 15 minutes of growth.
Horizontal gene transmission (HGT) is the
acquisition
of
genes for resistance from another organism. For example, a
streptomycete
has a gene for resistance to streptomycin (its own antibiotic), but
somehow
that gene escapes and gets into E. coli or Shigella.
Or,
more likely, some bacterium develops genetic resistance through the
process
of mutation and selection and then donates these genes to some other
bacterium
through one of several processes for genetic exchange that exist in
bacteria.
Bacteria are able to exchange genes in nature by
three processes: conjugation, transduction and transformation. Conjugation
involves cell-to-cell contact as DNA crosses a sex pilus from donor to
recipient. During transduction, a virus transfers the genes
between
mating bacteria. In transformation, DNA is acquired directly
from
the environment, having been released from another cell. Genetic
recombination
can follow the transfer of DNA from one cell to another leading to the
emergence of a new genotype (recombinant). It is common for DNA to be
transferred
as plasmids between mating bacteria. Since bacteria usually develop
their
genes for drug resistance on plasmids (called resistance factors
[R-factors] or resistance transfer factors [RTFs]), these genetic
elements play heavily in the of spread drug resistance to other strains
and
species during genetic exchange processes.
The combined effects of fast growth rates, high
populations of cells, genetic processes of mutation and selection,
and
the ability to exchange genes, account for the extraordinary rates of
adaptation
and evolution that can be observed in the bacteria. For these reasons
bacterial
adaptation (resistance) to the antibiotic environment seems to take
place
very rapidly in evolutionary time: bacteria evolve fast!
The medical problem of
bacterial drug resistance
Obviously, if a bacterial pathogen is able to
develop
or acquire resistance to an antibiotic, then that substance becomes
useless
in the treatment of infectious disease caused by that pathogen (unless
the resistance can somehow be overcome with secondary measures). So as
pathogens develop resistance, we must find new (different) antibiotics
to fill the place of the old ones in treatment regimes. Hence, natural
penicillins have become useless against staphylococci and must be
replaced
by other antibiotics; tetracycline, having been so widely used and
misused
for decades, has become worthless for many of the infections where it
once worked as a "wonder drug".
Not only is there a problem in finding new
antibiotics
to fight old diseases (because resistant strains of bacteria have
emerged),
there is a parallel problem to find new antibiotics to fight new
diseases.
In the past two decades, many "new" bacterial diseases have been
discovered
(Legionnaire's disease, gastric ulcers, Lyme disease, toxic shock
syndrome,
"skin-eating" streptococci). We are only now able to examine patterns
of
susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics among new pathogens that
cause
these diseases. Broad patterns of resistance exist in these pathogens,
and it seems likely that we will soon need new antibiotics to replace
the
handful that are effective now against these bacteria, especially as
resistance
begins to emerge among them in the selective environment antibiotic
chemotherapy.
Alternatives
to Antibiotics
Phage therapy is the therapeutic use of
lytic
bacteriophages to
treat
pathogenic bacterial infections. Phage therapy is an alternative to
antibiotics being developed for clinical use by research groups in
Eastern Europe and the U.S. After having been extensively used and
developed mainly in former Soviet Union countries for about 90 years,
phage therapies for a variety of bacterial and poly microbial
infections are now becoming available on an experimental basis in other
countries, including the U.S. The principles of phage therapy have
potential applications not only in human medicine, but also in
dentistry, veterinary science, food science and agriculture.
An important benefit of phage therapy is derived from the observation
that bacteriophages are much more specific than most antibiotics that
are in clinical use. Theoretically, phage therapy is harmless to the
eucaryotic host undergoing therapy, and it should not affect the
beneficial normal flora of the host. Phage therapy also has few, if
any, side effects, as opposed to drugs, and does not stress the liver.
Since phages are self-replicating in their target bacterial cell, a
single, small dose is theoretically efficacious. On the other hand,
this specificity may also be disadvantageous because a specific phage
will only kill a bacterium if it is a match to the specific subspecies.
Thus, phage mixtures may be applied to improve the chances of success,
or clinical samples can be taken and an appropriate phage identified
and grown.
Phages are currently being used therapeutically to treat bacterial
infections that do not respond to conventional antibiotics,
particularly in the country of Georgia. They are reported to be
especially successful where bacteria have constructed a biofilm
composed of a polysaccharide matrix that antibiotics cannot penetrate.
END OF CHAPTER
Previous Page
Return to Page 1